Legal Opinion

Michael Baranofsky, Kimberly Gale, and Lawrence Essember, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Rousselot Peabody, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided July 22, 2020No. 2084CV00896-BLS2Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPERIOR COURT

MICHAEL BARANOFSKY, KIMBERLY GALE, AND LAWRENCE ESSEMBER, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. ROUSSELOT PEABODY, INC.

Docket:

2084CV00896-BLS2

Dates:

May 29, 2020

Present:

/s/Kenneth W. Salinger Justice of the Superior Court

County:

SUFFOLK, ss.

Keywords:

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Rousselot Peabody, Inc., runs a gelatin manufacturing facility in Peabody, Massachusetts. The Plaintiffs live nearby. They contend that the plant frequently exudes noxious, disgusting odors that cause headaches, nausea, and vomiting. Plaintiffs allege that…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Curtis v. Herb Chambers I-95, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API