Legal Opinion · Dissent

S & R Lake Lounge, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1994Published

1Dissent

Friedmann, J., dissents and votes to confirm the determination, with the following memorandum:

The record establishes that S & R Lake Lounge (hereinafter the Lounge) was a topless go-go bar whose entertainment fee was included in the "additional cost of [each customer’s] first drink”. The Lounge’s witnesses testified that its doorman admitted the decedent after he displayed false identification. However, the police officer who subsequently inventoried the decedent’s personal effects found a variety of identification documents, but no false ones. Moreover, the decedent’s two friends testified…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gray v. AdduciNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. 4373 Tavern Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Culligan's Pub, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Panacea Tavern, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Park II Villa Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API