Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Paul

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1954No. Appeal, 109PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

The liquidating receiver of an insolvent corporation commenced this suit by a complaint in equity to recover the purchase price due on defendants’ subscriptions to corporate shares of stock. The learned court below accurately pointed out that the question “whether the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff or upon the defendants is all-important.” It ruled that, since the subscribers had failed to show the transfer of the consideration to the corporation was fair and that the property turned oyer to the corporation was valued in good faith, they had not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lyons v. BenneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. Beaver v. SlaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Loeffler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. KoEune v. State Bank of Schuylkill HavenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Pioneer Coal Co. v. Cherrytree & Dixonville R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waslow v. Grant Thornton LLP (In Re Jack Greenberg, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. In Re Condemnation by the County of AlleghenyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lezzer Cash & Carry, Inc. v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Savidge v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Zweifach v. SCRANTON LACE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API