Legal Opinion
Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1986No. 85 Civ. 9361 (RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEET, District Judge.
In this action brought under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., defendants move to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and to plead fraud with particularity under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) and because the action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. In addition, defendants move to recover costs and attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. For the following reasons the motion to dismiss is granted, and the motion to recover costs and…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Telectronics Proprietary, Ltd. v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Schwartz v. NOVO INDUSTRI A/SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Stevens v. EQUIDYNE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES 1980District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.