Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Gonsalves & Santucci, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 5, 2022No. 3:21-cv-07874Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ELMER N. RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 21-cv-07874-LB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT 14 GONSALVES & SANTUCCI, INC., Re: ECF No. 34 15 Defendant. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this putative class action, the plaintiff — a construction worker — sued his former employer 19 in state court, claiming that employees routinely worked overtime hours, generally because they 20 were not compensated for tasks that they had to complete before clocking in at the beginning…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Kobold v. Good Samaritan Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API