Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. Hendrix
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
This case went to trial on amended counts 1 and 2 of the complaint. Demurrers to these counts, raising substantially the same questions in respect to each, were overruled, and these rulings of the court are assigned for error.
Count 1. This count, after showing that the death of plaintiff’s intestate occurred in a collision between trains of defendant and the Southern Railway Company, at a crossing of the two roads, alleged;
“That the said defendants [at that time, the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company was a party defendant, but was afterwards eliminated by amendment], by and through…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Capital Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Cooper v. WattsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- State v. DunlapSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. GrizzardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- State v. PeinhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.