Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. E & L Development, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 2010No. 45,683-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

| ,The defendant, E & L Development, Inc., appeals a judgment ordering it to pay the plaintiffs, Bryan and Brandee McCarthy (the “McCarthys”), $25,000 in damages and $15,762.82 in attorney fees and other costs for a redhibitory defect, namely, a natural drain that runs through their backyard and makes the part of the backyard affected by the natural drain unusable for its intended purpose when it rains. Because the McCarthys did not meet the burden of proving a redhibitory defect, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in favor of E & L Development by dismissing the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. S.J. v. Lafayette Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  3. Cox v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Kemper v. Don Coleman, Jr., Builder, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Millspaw v. KnightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newton v. DongieuxLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Decker v. MeltonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Hancock v. LauzonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Leonard A. Radlauer v. Remax and Pat CurtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API