Legal Opinion

Hume v. Thomason

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 21, 1983No. AR-187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Claimant Hume appeals the deputy commissioner’s order dismissing with prejudice Hume’s claim for benefits because he had elected to maintain an action at law for damages on account of his injury, pursuant to section 440.11(1), Florida Statutes (1981). We affirm.1

When injured, Hume was working as a carpenter remodeling the Thomasons’ home. Eugene Thomason, acting as general contractor, was Hume’s employer but had failed to secure workers’ compensation insurance.2 Therefore, instead of filing a claim for compensation benefits, Hume pursued a civil remedy in circuit court,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams, Et Ux. v. RobineauSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Matthews v. GSP CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Williams v. DugganSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  4. Marta v. Continental Mfg. Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Greene v. Maharaja of India, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API