Legal Opinion

Williams v. Duggan

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 15, 1963No. 31847PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

153 So.2d 726 (1963)

L.B. WILLIAMS, Petitioner,

v.

W.E. DUGGAN and Rebecca Duggan, Respondents.

No. 31847.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 15, 1963.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1963.

Fisher & Hepner, Pensacola, for petitioner.

William D. Barrow, Crestview, and Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Middlebrooks & Gaines, Pensacola, for respondents.

DREW, Justice.

We have little difficulty in reaching the conclusion that the decision of the district court here under review,[1] as explained in its opinion containing full statement of the facts, is in direct conflict in the constitutional sense with both Williams v. Robineau[2]…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams, Et Ux. v. RobineauSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. McCormick v. BodekerSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chorak v. NaughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Pearson v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Lowry v. LoganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Velez v. Oxford Development Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API