Legal Opinion
Millner v. Mumby
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1992No. 90A05-9203-CV-71PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.
C. Michael Millner appeals the judgment of the Wells Circuit Court which found that Jeff Mumby had not breached the construction contract between the parties by performing his obligations under the contract in an unworkmanlike manner. We affirm.
Millner raises two issues, which we restate as follows:
1. Did the trial court violate the parol evidence rule when it admitted testimony that Millner was the party who drafted the contract specifications that proved to be defective?
2. Was the judgment supported by sufficient evidence?
The following are the facts most favorable to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Ames v. AmesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
- Steenhoven v. College Life Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. ThatcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Steenhoven v. College Life Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Paulson v. Centier BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- I.C.C. Protective Coatings, Inc. v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Krieg v. HieberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Illiana Surgery & Medical Center, LLC v. STG Funding, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Truck City of Gary, Inc. v. Schneider National LeasingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.