Legal Opinion

Pedroso v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1984No. 83-2443PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a court order finding the appellant in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena duces tecum, as ordered to by the court. We affirm.

The appellant is the records custodian of Eight & Eight Centro Medico, Inc. (Medico). In the course of conducting a Medicaid fraud investigation of Medico, the Auditor General’s Office caused the trial court to issue a subpoena duces tecum requiring the appellant to produce for inspection medical and health claims forms submitted to the Medicaid fiscal agency for sixty-two named Medicaid patients of Medico. The appellant did not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Adams v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Little Beaver Theatre, Inc. v. State ex rel. GersteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Butterworth v. X HospitalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1989
  4. MARCEL ASHLEY v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API