Legal Opinion
Singh v. Frye
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 2, 1960No. Civ. 9673PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of defendant and from the order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover for damage to plaintiff’s peach orchard alleged to have resulted from seepage of water used by defendant in the irrigation of rice.
On appeal plaintiff contends (1) that the evidence does not support the verdict; (2) that the court committed certain errors of law; and (3) that the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.
We find no merit in plaintiff’s first contention. The record, when…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kline v. Santa Barbara Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Langdon v. LangdonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Hayden v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Eley v. CurzonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Patterson v. MisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Kyle v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Tracy v. TracyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Carlotto, Ltd. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.