Legal Opinion
Summitt Investigative Service, Inc. v. Herman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-01008 (CKK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Summitt Investigative Services, Inc. (“Summitt”) and its President, Harold Wigfall, and Vice President, Michael B. Holiday, bring suit under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A), to challenge the Secretary of Labor’s decision to debar them for three years from bidding on government contracts. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and separate briefs that address whether Count VII of the Complaint is properly before the Court. Having carefully reviewed the pleadings,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Daghlian v. DeVry University, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- James v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Karawia v. United States Department of LaborDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Tri-County Contractors, Inc. v. Thomas PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.