Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kendrick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 9, 2006PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.

We consider here whether a probation condition that the defendant have “no contact” with minors under sixteen years of age gave him sufficient notice that he was prohibited from displaying his antique automobile at a car show attended by minors. A District Court judge determined that the defendant *73violated his probation by this conduct and committed him to a house of correction to serve the balance of a suspended sentence.1 The defendant appealed and the Appeals Court affirmed the probation revocation. Commonwealth v. Kendrick, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 142 (2005). We granted the defendant’s…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. OrlandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. PowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hacker, Anthony WayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. People v. DevorssColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. RuizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Lawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API