Legal Opinion

Pendergast v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that portion *869of defendant’s motion seeking to compel a physical examination of plaintiff and properly granted that portion of plaintiff’s motion seeking a protective order with respect to the physical examination of plaintiff. Plaintiff commenced this personal injury action in 1992. In December 1993, plaintiff’s counsel served a notice fixing the time and place for a physical examination of plaintiff. Thereafter, at defendant’s request,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Buerger v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Marriott v. CappelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Marriott v. CappelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Marriott v. CappelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API