Seitlin & Co. v. Phoenix Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
COPE, Judge.
These are consolidated appeals from a declaratory judgment determining the existence of insurance coverage under a homeowner’s insurance policy, and a related judgment for indemnification. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The first issue is whether the trial court properly concluded that appellee Brad Schandler was an insured under his parents’ homeowner’s policy. Schandler’s parents lived in northern Dade County and were covered by a homeowner’s policy. Schandler enrolled in the University of Miami Law School. For convenience he took an apartment close to the law school.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Griffis v. HillSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Atlantic Nat. Bank of Florida v. VestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Tropical Park, Inc. v. US Fidelity & Guar.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seitlin & Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Schwartz v. BlochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012