Legal Opinion · Dissent

Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corporation v. Coe

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 29, 1938No. 7029Published

1DissentEdgerton, Associate Justice

(dissenting) .

I think there was no invention here; and I think weight should be given to the presumption of administrative correctness.

As the court states, among the uses of vinyl resin disclosed by Klatte is “an odorless, fireproof film which may be used for coating * * * various substances such as wood, paper,, textile fabric and artificial stone with the effect of imparting high resistance to the action of water, acids, alkalis and atmospheric changes;” and Kratz had applied a vinyl resin film to gelatine to produce “a thin, transparent sheet, substantially moisture proof, and especially…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API