Legal Opinion

People v. Burke

California Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1964No. Crim. 7914PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether certain evidence introduced at the trial of defendant was obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure.

*577About 4 a.m. on February 22, 1962, Dr. Norman Lavet went to his office at 1449 North Gardner Street, Los Angeles, in answer to a call from the police. He found that his office had been ransacked and that several items were missing, including an X-ray negative and some bottles of Demerol (which the doctor referred to as a narcotic agent). At 6:30 a.m. on the same day, a police officer observed two men in an automobile driving…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API