Legal Opinion

Broehm v. Mayo Clinic Rochester

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 2005No. C0-02-959Published

1Opinion of the Court

690 N.W.2d 721 (2005)

Amy Marie BROEHM, Appellant,

v.

MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER, Respondent.

No. C0-02-959.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 20, 2005.

Gerald J. Brown, Brown, Andrew & Signorelli, P.A., Duluth, MN, for Appellant.

Trudi Noel Trysla, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, of counsel, Thomas Fraser, Ann E. Decker, Lora Esch Mitchell, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

OPINION

ANDERSON, Russell A., Justice.

Appellant brought a medical malpractice action in connection with injury incurred during post-operative care…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API