State v. Pitre
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Judge.
¶ 1 Defendant Dwayne Alvin Pitre appeals from his convictions and sentences for fourteen crimes, arguing the superior court erred in admitting into evidence prior convictions for purposes of impeachment. During the pendency of the appeal, this Court ordered Pitre and the State to file supplemental briefs discussing the propriety of Pitre’s sentences under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). For the reasons stated below, we affirm Pitre’s convictions but vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. CleereCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State of Arizona v. Kevin Albert JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. CleereCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. PitreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005