Legal Opinion
State v. Wurm
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 17, 1982No. 4121-2-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Michael P. Wurm appeals his conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. RCW 46.61.502. We affirm.
*259The only issue presented and not resolved by the recent decision, State v. Franco, 96 Wn.2d 816, 639 P.2d 1320 (1982), is whether defendant was denied his right to counsel when, although he received Miranda warnings, he was not specifically advised he had the right to consult with an attorney before taking the Breathalyzer test.
The stipulated facts are: About 1 a.m. on March 16,1980, a Washington State Patrol trooper observed defendant's vehicle weaving over the center…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GilcristWashington Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. TellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993