State v. Gilcrist
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
An inmate of the state penitentiary, inmate Johnson, was stabbed 31 times by other inmates. Appellants Gilcrist and Agtuca were charged with and convicted by a jury of that first-degree assault. Later both appellants were determined to be habitual criminals under RCW 9.92.090. Their appeals were consolidated. We affirm.
While there is conflicting testimony, the jury could have believed the State's witnesses as to the following testimony: (1) Prison guard Thompson saw appellants Agtuca and Gilcrist attack and repeatedly stab inmate Johnson with knives crafted from broom handles and metal rods.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. NoltieWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.