Legal Opinion

State v. Gilcrist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1979No. 45595PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

An inmate of the state penitentiary, inmate Johnson, was stabbed 31 times by other inmates. Appellants Gilcrist and Agtuca were charged with and convicted by a jury of that first-degree assault. Later both appellants were determined to be habitual criminals under RCW 9.92.090. Their appeals were consolidated. We affirm.

While there is conflicting testimony, the jury could have believed the State's witnesses as to the following testimony: (1) Prison guard Thompson saw appellants Agtuca and Gilcrist attack and repeatedly stab inmate Johnson with knives crafted from broom handles and metal rods.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. Kwan Fai MakWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. NoltieWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API