Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Pannell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 21, 1972No. 8 Div. 491PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the rulings of the trial court in sustaining defendant’s demurrers to the one count of the original complaint, and to the several counts added thereto by amendment. Plaintiff below, appellant here, took a nonsuit based upon such adverse rulings, and assigns as error the adverse rulings of the court in sustaining defendant’s demurrers, and has appealed as authorized by statute. Tit. 7, § 819, Code 1940.

There are four assignments of error, all relating to the same rulings. Both sides have submitted their briefs and arguments in bulk, and wc will sc consider them as a unit.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Autry v. Roebuck Park Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Thompson v. Alexander City Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Skelton v. Twin County Rural Elec. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Cassel v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Bailey v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API