Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 5, 1940No. 28202PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) “Upon their own motion before judicial determination or upon the applica-' tion of any party in interest on the ground of a change in condition, the Industrial Board may, within two years from the date that the board is notified of the final payment of claim, review any award or any settlement made between the parties and filed with the board and, on such, review, may make an award ending, diminishing or increasing the compensation previously awarded or agreed upon.” Code, § 114-709, as amended by the acts of 1937 (Ga. L. 1937, pp. 230, 233; 528, 534).…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API