Legal Opinion

Powell v. Nietmann

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1989No. 17549Published

1Opinion of the Court

778 P.2d 340 (1989)

116 Idaho 590

Donald L. POWELL and Muriel J. Powell, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

James A. NIETMANN and Mary J. Nietmann, husband and wife, Defendants-Cross Claimants-Respondents, and

Dave Reynolds and Jerry Van Ooyen, d/b/a Sommerfeld Realty, Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellants.

No. 17549.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

August 9, 1989.

Gary A. Finney, Sandpoint, for appellants, Dave Reynolds and Jerry Van Ooyen.

James H. Paulsen, Sandpoint, for defendants-cross claimants-respondents, Nietmanns.

Nicholas M. Lamanna, of Priest River, Idaho, attorney for plaintiffs-respondents, Powells.

JOHNSO…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tusch Enterprises v. CoffinIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. May Trucking Co. v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Smith v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API