Legal Opinion

Grovene James Finley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1957No. 16429PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from his conviction of possessing and transporting nontaxpaid distilled spirits, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 5008(b) (1), 5642.

The action of the trial judge in sustaining a prosecution objection to a question calling for an obviously hearsay answer was eminently proper in view of appellant’s inability to present any acceptable theory under which the answer would have been admissible. Horne v. United States, 5 Cir., 246 F.2d 83. Actually, the particular question was answered anyway and no motion to strike was made or instruction to disregard given.

Appellant’s present complaint that no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Wilbur Horne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  3. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. McDonold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Max Franklin Roper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Willis Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Max Franklin Roper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API