Legal Opinion · Dissent

Griggs v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1920No. 21257Published

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: William A. Redick, Judge.

1DissentCornish, J.

If the opinion properly states the law, then I think the next legislature should enact a new law, as the «legislature of 1917 considered doing. The opinion in effect holds that the parties to a lawsuit cannot settle their controversy without the consent of their attorneys — a rule never before announced, so far as I know, by any court.

It would not be surprising if we lawyers, who have ourselves received contingent fees, should be biased in favor of a practice absolutely forbidden at the common law. At common law, settlements were always encouraged by the courts. Lawyers were regarded as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrewes v. . HaasNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Cones v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Corson v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Southworth v. RosendahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Jones v. Duff Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API