State v. Rossow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Defendant appeals from a conviction of violation of Minn. St. 169.121, subd. 1(d), driving a motor vehicle while his blood-alcohol content exceeded 0.10 percent. The basis for this conviction was evidence of a blood test which showed defendant’s alcohol content to be 0.235 percent. In denying defendant’s motion to suppress this evidence, the trial court found that the test had been taken voluntarily within the meaning of § 169.121, subd. 2, which provides in part:
“Upon the trial of any prosecution arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person arrested…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. CapelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Tyler v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. AguirreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.