Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. United States

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided May 23, 2003No. A4-02-042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the Plaintiffs and the Defendant. The Plaintiffs, Larry and Coleen Armstrong, initiated the above-entitled action to recover taxes they paid as a result of an allegedly erroneous assessment by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

This case is about two retirement accounts pledged as collateral for a personal loan. The dispute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lenthe Investments, Inc. v. Service Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. North Dakota Mineral Interests, Inc. v. BergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bala v. PWE Enters., Inc. (In re Racing Servs., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API