Legal Opinion

Breen v. Shatz

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 7, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

In an action for malicious prosecution growing out of certain criminal proceedings, the plaintiff, Nora Breen, filed an amended petition seeking additional damages on the ground that subsequent to the filing of plaintiff’s petition the defendant, Shatz, had filed a civil action against her which had been terminated in her favor in circuit court. The defendant, by appropriate pleading, stated that an appeal was pending in this court from the judgment entered in the civil action and moved that plaintiff’s amended petition be dismissed on that ground. The motion was sustained and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spring v. BesoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1851
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. One Thousand Fleet Ltd. Partnership v. GuerrieroCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Cazares v. Church of Scientology of Cal., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Snyder v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  5. Moran v. KlatzkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API