Commonwealth v. Marks Contracting, Ltd.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
I respectfully disagree that Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) field inspectors are empowered to initiate significant criminal prosecutions without reference to law enforcement officers or judicial officers under the statute known as the 1957 Blasting Act.1 I dissent because such power is unexpressed, unnecessary, and unwise.
First, it is undisputed that the 1957 Blasting Act does not expressly authorize agency employees to initiate criminal proceedings.2 Significantly, the statute spe-eifically vests civil enforcement authority by granting the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LeetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. ScolieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. DaughertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. JokiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.