Legal Opinion

Leyendecker v. Cousins

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 4, 1989No. 11002-4-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

—William Leyendecker appeals a summary judgment granted to Curtis Cousins, et al, and an order awarding certain costs to the defendants. Leyendecker contends that the trial court erred (1) in granting summary judgment for the defendants under the assumption of risk doctrine; and (2) in assessing costs of discovery depositions as taxable costs. We reverse both judgment and order and remand for trial.

Guy Blevins, the purchaser of stumpage rights to wood on ITT Rayonier land, hired Leyendecker, a logger, to work as a cutter in a cedar salvage operation. Leyendecker's duties included cutting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hontz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kirk v. Washington State UniversityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hostetler v. WardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Spurrell v. BlockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Anderson v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Mauch v. KisslingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Alston v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API