Legal Opinion

Salinas v. Nestle Purina PetCare Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 19, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01140Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMMAUEL SALINAS, on behalf of himself ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-01140 JLT CDB and the Class Members, ) 12 ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR Plaintiff, ) PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ) ACTION SETTLEMENT ) 14 v. ) (Doc. 51) ) 15 NESTLÉ PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, ) ) 16 Defendant. ) ) 17 18 Emmanuel Salinas asserts Nestlé Purina PetCare Company failed to comply with wage and hour 19 laws arising under the California Labor Code, California Business & Professions Code, and Fair Labor 20 Standards Act. (See…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API