Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Coeur D'Alene Mining Co. v. First National Bank

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1990No. 17565Published

1Concurrence

BOYLE, Justice,

specially concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion and write only to clearly state the basis of my concurrence. A review of the record demonstrates that Aubert enjoyed a relationship with the manager of FNB who never inquired or confirmed Aubert’s claimed additional fiduciary authority. I am of the opinion that such inquiry and confirmation is a necessary step required under the applicable statutes and general principles of agency law. It would have been a simple matter for FNB to confirm Aubert’s claim *826to increased powers and authorities but it failed to do so.

As pointed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zions First National Bank v. Clark Clinic Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Levy v. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Bellflower AG Service, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Marion National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API