Montagne v. Tinker
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Per curiam
The principal issue presented by this motion is whether, after rehearing is denied and our judgment on the appeal proper is final in this court, we still retain jurisdiction to rule on peremptory exceptions which had been filed prior to our denial of rehearing.
By our original opinion of March 21, 1967, we reversed a trial court judgment which had dissolved a writ of sequestration *703obtained by the plaintiffs-appellants. La. App., 197 So.2d 154. On April 17, 1967, the defendant-appellee filed for the first time in this court, LSA-CCP Art. 2163,1 certain pleadings which he termed peremptory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Orrell v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- State v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Edenborn v. BlacksherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Montagne v. TinkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pearson v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Page v. A. GIAMBELLUCA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Sarpy v. SarpyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978