Legal Opinion

Yeates v. Walker

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 4, 1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions

CASE 27 — PETITION ORDINARY cited 1 Dana, 609; Civil Code, sec. 114; 4 /. /. M., 71; 13 B. M., 383.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE PETERS

delivered the opinion of the court :

Appellant held a note on the two Humes for upwards of $800, executed on the-day of ---, 1861, and due on the first of January next thereafter, upon which he made the following assignment: “Value received, I assign this note to Owen W. Walker, and if not paid I bind myself to pay it.” There is no date to this assignment.

On the 16th of February, 1863, appellee instituted a joint action against the payors and appellant as assignor of the note, and judgment having been rendered by default against him alone, he now seeks to reverse that judgment on…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of Blaine v. HanshawCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Merchants' Ins. Co. v. BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  3. Yager v. Kentucky Title Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  4. Board of Trustees v. OllerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API