Legal Opinion

(PC) Robinson v. Willsmore

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 16, 2025No. 2:24-cv-02246Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEANDRE ROBINSON, No. 2:24-cv-2246 DAD SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 NOAH WILLSMORE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this 19 action (ECF No. 2) and submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire 20 filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 21 pauperis…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API