Legal Opinion

Selelyo v. Drury

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 31, 1980No. C-3-78-369PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY HOLDING CAPTIONED CAUSE TO BE NOT MOOT; ORDER CONSOLIDATING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION WITH TRIAL UPON THE MERITS, PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 65(a)(2); FINAL PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES SET

RICE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the issue of whether the plaintiff’s cause of action has been rendered moot. The defendants contend that their actions, taken subsequent to the filing of the plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, have brought them into compliance with all requirements of the law, and thus plaintiff no longer has a viable cause of action. Plaintiff, on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Timms v. Metropolitan School District Of Wabash CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Espino v. BesteiroDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
  3. Arvin Industries v. WanandiDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  4. Timms ex rel. Timms v. Metropolitan School District of Wabash CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Timms v. Metropolitan School District of Wabash County, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API