Legal Opinion
In re A.B.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 29, 1984No. 82-503PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
On March 15, 1982, the trial court found that A.B. was a “neglected” child under the provisions of D.C.Code §§ 16-2301(9)(B)-(C) (1981). The child’s natural mother, A.K.B., appeals the trial court’s subsequent order committing A.B. to the Social Rehabilitation Administration’s custody and requests that custody be restored to her. We affirm.
Before we begin our review of this appeal, we shall address the jurisdictional questions raised by appellee. Appellee, noting that the Superior Court Neglect Rules do not specifically provide for motions for reconsideration, argues that it is unclear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re C. I. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Coleman v. Lee Washington Hauling Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- In Re LEMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- United States v. JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- 901 CORPORATION v. A. Sandler Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re AK. V.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re Na.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Hsue Tung v. W.T. Cabe & Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 639 v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.