Legal Opinion

State v. Mullikin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1846PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, J.>

Indictment for keeping a nuisance. Indictment quashed. It charges that the defendant, being licensed to retail spirituous liquors, caused and procured certain evil disposed persons, for the lucre and gain of the said defendant, to congregate in and about the grocery in which said liquors were sold, and permitted them there to remain drinking, cursing, blackguarding, fighting, misbehaving themselves, &c.

The case of The State v. Bertheol, 6 Blackf. 474, decides that unlicensed retailing houses, kept as that in this indictment is charged to have been, are public nuisances at common…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BertheolIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  2. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Price v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Ingersoll v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Beebe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API