Walton v. . Bristol
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil Action for the immediate possession of certain promissory notes, claimed as tbe property of plaintiff, and held by defendant L. A. Bristol, receiver of the Piedmont Bank of Morganton, tried before McNeill, J., at Spring Term, 1899, of the Superior Court of BuRKe County.
Read the full summary
Civil Action for the immediate possession of certain promissory notes, claimed as tbe property of plaintiff, and held by defendant L. A. Bristol, receiver of the Piedmont Bank of Morganton, tried before McNeill, J., at Spring Term, 1899, of the Superior Court of BuRKe County. Jury trial was waived, and the facts were found by his Honor, who rendered judgment- against the plaintiff, and she excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court- The facts found by his Honor are fully recapitulated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Jury trial was waived, and the facts were found by his Honor, who rendered judgment against the plaintiff, and she excepted and appealed to the Supreme Court.
The facts found by his Honor are fully recapitulated in the opinion. MONTGOMERY, J., writes the opinion.
CLARK, J., writes dissenting opinion. This is an action on the part of the plaintiffs to recover of the defendants the possession of certain personal property consisting of certain promissory notes and another paper writing mentioned in the complaint; one of the notes being in the sum of $1,250, executed on the 18th March, 1893, by S.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bates v. SultanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Kirkman v. Bank of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- Taylor v. SikesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vann v. Edwards.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- A. Brinkley & Co. v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Rea v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Rawls v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Vann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.