Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pitts v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 5, 1944No. 14727Published

1DissentAtkinson, Justice

While the foregoing represents the majority opinion, I cannot concur therein for two reasons: (a) I do not think that the evidence is sufficient to authorize the verdict; and (b) I think that the first special ground of the motion for new trial, as set out in the second division of the opinion, was a sufficient assignment of error.(a) The only evidence that tends to place the accused at the scene of the crime at the time of its commission is the testimony in reference to tracks leading therefrom to the sawmill, and the evidence of the conduct of the bloodhounds. Unless this evidence is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Aiken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Cummings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API