Legal Opinion

Aiken v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1913No. 4871PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Indictment for burglary; from Butts superior court — Judge B. T. Daniel. April 12, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

The defendant was charged with burglary. Omitting the proof as to the corpus delicti, it appears from the evidence that a lady heard a noise in a dwelling-house and saw a negro man make his escape by jumping from a window of the house to the ground. The only real question in the case was as to the identity of the culprit. Among other circumstances submitted to show that the accused was the burglar, the court permitted evidence to be introduced as to the conduct of a bloodhound which was put upon tracks on the ground near the window from which the alleged *849burglar made Ms escape. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Pedigo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  4. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Brott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Terrell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Meriwether v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Buck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API