Iwanicki v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Christopher Iwanicki, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his complaint. We will affirm.
Iwanicki was incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution in Mercer, Pennsylvania (“SCI-Mercer”) when the events occurred that gave rise to his civil action. While working as a legal aide in the prison law library, Iwanicki used a library computer to write to Deb Alvord, 1 a paralegal in the Office of Chief Counsel for the Department of Corrections, complaining about certain library policies at SCI-Mercer. He used an interlibrary loan envel…
3Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- BOND v. WELCH DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASEDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- BRADLEY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BRADLEY v. DIST. COUNCIL 47District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BRADLEY v. PHILA. POLICE DEPT.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BRADLEY v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.