Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided January 10, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Max Mobley, Secretary Sex Offenders Assessment Committee P.O. Box 6209 Pine Bluff, AR 71611

Dear Mr. Mobley:

You have presented the following question for my opinion:

Does the Sex Offenders Assessment Committee's proposed alternative procedure for determining who is a sexually violent predator violate the 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution or any federal or state statute?

You have attached a copy of your proposed changes to the statute that governs the determination of whether an individual should be classified as a sexually violent predator.

RESPONSE

It is my opinion, as discussed below,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API