Legal Opinion

Day v. Needham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 30, 1893No. 127PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a verdict and judgment depriving appellant of a section of land situated in Denton County, patented to the heirs of William Wallace. The verdict is sustained by the evidence in establishing the conclusion, that the title to the land in controversy had been vested in appellees (about which there is no dispute here), and that they were entitled to recover, unless the adverse possession of appellant under a tax deed, which was excluded from the evidence, had the effect of defeating that title. If this deed was not admissible for any of the purposes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Overand v. MenczerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Brokel v. McKechnieTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. McConnell v. WallTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Scheiber v. KaehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Wall v. McConnellTexas Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Long v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. KishiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Trent Lindig v. Pleasant Hill Rocky Community Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API