People v. Fichtner
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Vollack
We granted certiorari to decide whether co-defendants are jointly responsible for restitution for a victim’s damaged property and whether the trial court’s failure to define “serious bodily injury” in its jury instruction on menacing with a deadly weapon constitutes plain error.
The People petitioned this court to review the decision of the court of appeals in People v. Fichtner, No. 91CA0246 (Colo.App. Dec. 17, 1992), holding that (1) a defendant is not jointly liable for restitution when the damage was caused by his co-defendant, and (2) the trial court committed plain error by failing to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. HoehlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- People v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bogdanov v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Auman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- People v. DunlapColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.