Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Employers' Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1981No. 80-63PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Mathis was injured when the motorcycle he was riding collided with an automobile operated by an uninsured motorist. Mathis claims that he was an "insured" under the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Employers' Fire Insurance Company to his stepfather, Don Hollis, even though he was not living in the same house with his stepfather, but was living in a house with his mother, who at the time of the accident was separated from, and later divorced from, Hollis. The trial court concluded, as a matter of law, that Mathis was not an "insured"…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Loveless v. GraddickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. American States Ins. Co., Western Pac. Div. v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Bearden v. RuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Jenks v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Brown v. TrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API