Legal Opinion

State v. Bond

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1973No. 736SC808Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

By his assignment of error number 4, defendant contends the trial judge expressed an opinion to the jury in violation of G.S. 1-180 by extensively questioning defendant and his witnesses. The assignment is sustained.

The record reveals that in the initial presentation of its case, the State introduced three witnesses. On the initial presentation, the trial judge did not ask two of the witnesses any questions and asked the third witness two questions. Defendant then presented nine witnesses in addition to himself, the first of his witnesses being Columbus (Lump) Williams. After the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. McEachernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API