Legal Opinion
In Re Lukasik
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1951No. Civ. No. 8140PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
108 Cal.App.2d 438 (1951)
In re Dolores Lukasik, on Behalf of RONALD WILLIAM LUKASIK et al. DOLORES LUKASIK, Petitioner,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY et al., Respondents.
Civ. No. 8140.
California Court of Appeals. Third Dist.
Dec. 27, 1951.
James M. Thuesen and George C. Barrett for Petitioner.
Anderson & Peck for Respondents.
VAN DYKE, J.
William M. Lukasik and Dolores Lukasik are husband and wife and the parents of two minor children, Ronald William Lukasik and Kenneth Mathew Lukasik, who are 7 and 5 years of age. Heretofore Dolores filed suit for divorce against her husband William and a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kinard v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Merced Mining Co. v. FremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Greene v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Law Finance Group, LLC v. KeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.